Madras High CourtSA/1011/2001dismissed for default

1.Venkatammal v. 1.Seenappa

2018-09-27Honourable Mrs Justice R. Hemalatha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.09.2018

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA S.A.No.1011 of 2001

1. Venkatammal

2. Jayamma

3. Lakshmamma

4. Sujatha .. Appellants/Plaintiffs /Vs/

1. Seenappa

2. Lakshmakka

3. P.Srinivasan

4. P.Krishnan

5. Yasodha

6. Radha

7. Sundarachari

8. Nagaraju

9. Janardhanam

10. Palani

11. Ibrahim

12. Rathna ... Respondents/Dependents PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 24.08.2000 in A.S.No.100 of 1999 on the file of the learned Principal District Judge of Dharmapuri, Krishnagiri, upholding the decree and Judgment dated 31.08.1999 in O.S.No.260 of 1996 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Hosur.

For Appellants : Mr.V.Nicholas For Respondents : Mr.V.Raghavachari

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel appearing for the appellants contended that the matter is settled between the parties and he does not have any instructions from the appellants. He also reported no instructions from the appellants and made an endorsement in the vakalat.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. The learned counsel for the respondents is also present and he has also informed this Court that he does not have any instructions from his clients.

3. Since the Second Appeal is of the year 2001, the same is dismissed for default. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-II) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vkr/dna To

1. The Principal District Judge of Dharmapuri,Krishnagiri.

2. The Subordinate Judge, Hosur.

3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras. +1cc to Mr.V.Nicholas, Advocate SR.No.67018 +1cc to Mr.V.Raghavachari, Advocate SR.No.67305 S.A.No.1011 of 2001 GMY(22/10/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/