Sureshkrishna v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Nineteenth day of January Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.1012 of 2022 1 SURESHKRISHNA [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 PRADEEP @ MUTHUSAMY Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEW SIRKAZHI POLICE STATION, MAYILADUTHURAI DISTRICT.

CR.NO.16 OF 2022.

For Petitioner : M/S. M.VINOTH Advocate For Respondent : MR.N.S.SUGANTHAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Section 4 (1) (aaa) r/w 4 (1-A) of TNP Act in Crime No.16 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) reported that the accused person had been arrested.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Recording the above submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), that the accused persons have been arrested there is no question of granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to work out his remedies in accordance with law.

-sd/- 19/01/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEW SIRKAZHI POLICE STATION, MAYILADUTHURAI DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1 CC to M/S. M.VINOTH Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.805 CRL OP.1012/2022 Date :19/01/2022 TA-14/02/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/