N.Rajagopalan,S/O.V.K.Nataraja v. 1.S.Kandasamy,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30.06.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.A.No.1090 of 2001 and C.M.P.No.11449 of 2001 N.Rajagopalan ...Appellant vs.

1.S.Kandasamy 2.P.Jayapal

...Respondents

Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 27.7.99 in A.S.No.57/97 on the file of the Principal District Court, Salem reversing the judgment and decree dated 30.7.96 in O.S.No.1184/90 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Salem. For Appellant : Mr.N.Rajagopalan - No appearance For Respondents : Ms.Hemalatha for R1 - No Appearance R2 - served - No appearance

JUDGMENT

On the last hearing date i.e. on 24.06.2021, learned counsel representing counsel on record for the Appellant would submit that despite their best efforts to contact the client and intimate the date of hearing, they have been unable to do so. 2.Learned counsel for the Appellant had reported "no instructions" in this matter on the last hearing date, i.e. on 24.06.2021.

3.Thereafter, this Court directed the Registry to print the name of the Appellant in the cause list and list the matter on 30.06.2021.

4.Today, when the matter taken up for hearing, once again there is no representation on the side of the Appellant. It can now be inferred that the Appellant is not interested in prosecuting the Second Appeal.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar pam To 1.The Principal District Court, Salem.

2.The Additional District Munsif Court, Salem. Copy to:

The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras-104 S.A.No.1090 of 2001 AD(CO) CB(16/07/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/