Byrappa v. State Rep By Its Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.01.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Crl.O.P.No.952 of 2022 1.Byrappa 2.Srinath ... Petitioners Vs.
The State represented by The Inspector of Police Denkanikottai Police Station, Krishnagiri District.
(Crime No.541 of 2021) ... Respondent/complainant Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on Anticipatory Bail in the event of his arrest in Cr.No.541 of 2021 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioners : Mr.M.P.Saravanan For Respondent : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan, Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioners, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 379 of IPC, in Crime No.541 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 28.12.2021, when the respondent police were on the regular checking of vehicles, they found that the petitioners have illegally transported 3 units of M.Sand by using lorry bearing number TN-70-6350 without any valid licence. Hence the complaint.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any
offence as alleged by the prosecution. However, on instructions, the learned counsel further submits that the petitioners, on his own volition, is ready and willing to contribute a sum of Rs.15,000/- to any Charitable Purpose as may be directed by this Court and he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent opposed for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners by stating that the petitioners had illegally transported 3 units of M.Sand by using lorry bearing number TN-70-6350 without any valid licence.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submissions made by the both counsel and also the fact that the petitioner has willfully and on his own volition agreed to contribute a sum of Rs.10,000/- for charitable purpose, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days after lifting of lockdown or the commencement of the Court's normal functioning whichever is earlier, before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Denkanikottai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioners are directed to deposit a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) to the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, Chennai within a period of fifteen (15) days after lifting of lockdown or the commencement of the Court's normal functioning whichever is earlier and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below;
[b] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [c] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police every Wednesday at 10.30 a.m for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and when required for an interrogation;
[d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
[e] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[f] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions has been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
[g] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC;
-sd/- 19/01/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DENKANIKOTTAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KRISHNAGIRI [FOR INFORMATION].
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DENKANIKOTTAI POLICE STATION, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
5 THE TAMILNADU STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY, CHENNAI.
CC to M.P.SARAVANAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.952/2022 Date :19/01/2022 JPA 25/01/2022