Kanaga v. The Inspector Of Police

CRL. O.P. No.10759 of 2015 R.SUBBIAH, J.

The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences, under Sections 420 r/w. 511, 423 IPC., and 423 r/w. 114 IPC., and seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that a case was registered against the petitioner, under the allegation of land grabbing.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is the false complaint and in fact, the petitioner was granted Anticipatory Bail by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Salem, in C.M.P.No.3519 of 2013 in Cr.No.24 of 2013, dated 21.10.2013. But the petitioner was not in a position to comply with the conditions imposed therein. Learned counsel for the petitioner produces the order, dated 21.10.2013, passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Salem, in C.M.P.No.3519 of 2013 in Cr.No.24 of 2013.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, but imposing stringent conditions.

R.SUBBIAH, J.

skm

5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Salem or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Salem, for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required. 30.04.2015 skm CRL. O.P. No.10759 of 2015