G.Krishnamurthy v. Fathima Beevi(Died)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 02.01.2020 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN S.A.No.869 of 2002 G.Krishnamurthy ...Appellant

Versus

1.Fathima Beevi (Died) 2.Habibgani 3.Syed Gani 4.Manjur Gani @ Abdul Gani (R2 to R4 brought on record as legal representatives of the deceased first respondent and they were set ex parte vide order dated 21.10.2019 made in C.M.P.Nos.9809 & 9810 of 2003)

...Respondents

This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C as against the judgment and decree dated 18.10.2001 passed in A.S.No.18 of 2001 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Nagapattinam confirming the judgment and the decree dated 19.04.2001 passed in O.S.No.189 of 2000 before the District Munsif Court, Nagapattinam.

For Appellant :

Ms.R.Meenal For Respondent - 1 :

Died Respondents 2 to 4 :

No Appearance Ex-Parte

J U D G M E N T

Today (02.01.2020), when the matter is came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the sole appellant is no more, however, till date, she has no instructions for impleading the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. In view of the submission made by the appellant's counsel, this Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII) // True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mrr To 1.The Principal Sub Court, Nagapattinam 2.The District Munsif Court, Nagapattinam.

Copy to: The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.

+1CC to Mr.R.Subramanian, Advocate, SR.No.227. S.A.No.869 of 2002 BR(CO) CSR: 04/01/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/