Madras High CourtCMP/8859/2006dismissed

Mr.P.Raja v. Mrs.Shanthi

2021-01-25Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam2 pages

C.M.P.Nos.8859 & 8860 of 2006 in C.M.S.A.SR.Nos.31995 & 31999 of 2005

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.01.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.M.P.Nos.8859 & 8860 of 2006 in C.M.S.A.SR.Nos.31995 & 31999 of 2005 Mr.P.Raja .. Petitioner in both CMPs Vs.

Mrs.Shanthi .. Respondent in both CMPs COMMON PRAYER: C.M.P.Nos.8859 & 8860 of 2006 are filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 150 days in preferring the appeal and permit the petitioner to file the appeals. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Dhanasekaran [In both CMPs] COMMON ORDER Notice was ordered to the respondent returnable by four weeks on 01.08.2006 and Private Notice was also permitted. In spite of the orders, the petitioner has not taken any steps to serve notice to the respondent for the past about 14 years. Thus, this Court is not inclined to keep the matters any further.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 1/2

C.M.P.Nos.8859 & 8860 of 2006 in C.M.S.A.SR.Nos.31995 & 31999 of 2005 kak

2. Accordingly, the miscellaneous petitions in C.M.P.Nos.8859 & 8860 of 2006 stand dismissed and consequently, C.M.S.A.SR.Nos.31995 & 31999 of 2005 stand rejected at the SR Stage itself. No costs. 25.01.2021 Kak Index:Yes To 1.The Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Vridhachalam.

2.The Sub Assistant Registrar, A.E.Section, High Court, Madras.

C.M.P.Nos.8859 & 8860 of 2006 in C.M.S.A.SR.Nos.31995 & 31999 of 2005 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 2/2