T.Chinnaraj v. Saroja

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 01.04.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA S.A.No. 97 of 2002 T. Chinnaraj ...Appellant/1st Defendant Vs.

1. Saroja

2. Vasantha

3. Manickam

4. Chennammal

5. Minnala

6. R. Jaya

...Respondents/Plaintiff 1 to 4

and Defendants 2 & 3 Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC against the decree and judgment passed in A.S. No.7 of 1998 dated 28.09.2000 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri, upholding the decree and judgment passed in O.S. No.202 of 1992 dated 28.10.1997 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Krishnagiri.

For Appellant : No appearance For R1 to R3 : Mr. V. Nicholas R4 : Not Ready in Notice R5 : No appearance R6 : Given up (order dated 22/07/2021)

JUDGMENT

Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. A perusal of the records shows that the appellant has not served notice to the fourth respondent till date. The second appeal is of the year 2002 and hence, I do not find any reason to keep the appeal pending.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. In view of the above, this second appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To

1. The I Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri.

2. The Subordinate Judge, Krishnagiri.

Copy to The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

S.A.No. 97 of 2002 SSI(CO) SP(12/05/2022) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/