Mullaiammal v. R.Govindan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09.01.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN S.A.No.1473 of 2001 1.Mullaiammal 2.Ganesan 3.Mariammal 4.Valli ...Plaintiffs/ Appellants/ Appellants Vs.

1.R.Govindan 2.R.Jeyarama Velaar 3.Fathima Beevi by her Power of Attorney Abdul Rahim ... Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against judgment and decree dated 05.07.2000 passed in A.S.No.5 of 2000 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Nagapattinam, against the judgment and decree dated 31.08.1999, in O.S.No.411 of 1993, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Thiruthuraipoondi.

For Appellants : Mr.G.Pugazhenthi For Respondents : No Appearance

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that all the three respondents died long back. Even till date, the appellant failed to take any steps to bring the legal heirs of the deceased respondents. It shows that the appellant has no interest to proceed further in this matter. 2.

Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed as abated granting liberty to file necessary petition to bring the legal heirs of the deceased respondents along with the abatement order. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar AT https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The Principal Subordinate Judge, Nagapattinam. 2.The District Munsif Court, Thiruthuraipoondi.

Copy to:

The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court,Madras. +1cc to Mr.G.Pugazhenthi , Advocate SR.No. 2280 S.A.No.1473 of 2001 A.SK(21/02/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/