V.Rajasekar v. The District Collector
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 11/1/2023 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR V.Rajasekar ...
Petitioner Vs
1. The District Collector Kallakurichi District Kallakurichi.
2. The Project Director Rural Development Department Kallakurichi District Kallakurichi.
3. The Executive Engineer Kallakurichi District Kallakurichi.
4. The Block Development Officer (Grama Urachi) Thirunavalur Union, Thirunavalur Kallakurichi District Kallakurichi.
...
Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the first and second respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 5/1/2023 and directing the fourth respondent to declare the petitioner and other participants who is a successful bidder in Notification in Na.Ka.en.A2/3794/2022 dated 20/12/2022, which held on 5/1/2023. Page No:1/4
For Petitioner ...
Mr.A.Bakkiya Lakshmi For respondent ...
Mr.K.Karthik Jeganath Government Advocate for R.R.1 to 3.
Mrs.N.Senthil Selvi Government Advocate for R.4.
- - - - -
O R D E R
This writ petition has been filed to direct the first and second respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 5/1/2023 and directing the fourth respondent to declare the petitioner and other participants who is a successful bidder in Notification in Na.Ka.en.A2/3794/2022 dated 20/12/2022, held on 5/1/2023.
2. Facts in brief are as follows:- The petitioner is the Union Civil Contractor. The first respondent had called for tender in various civil construction works, for the year 2022 - 2023, in Thirunavalur Panchayat, dated 20/12/2022, for construction of class rooms in various school to the fourth respondent Union. Page No:2/4
3. Reminder Notification also issued by the first respondent and tender was opened on 23/12/2022 to 5/1/2023. The petitioner had applied for the tender and EMD amount of Rs.2,31,000/- was paid. Tender was opened on 5/1/2023. But till date, respondents have not declared the tender result to the petitioner.
4. The main grievance of the petitioner is that even though it is the bounden duty of the respondents to announce the result, they failed to do so. Hence, the petitioner had submitted a representation dated 5/1/2023 to the first respondent. Since the same has not been considered so far, the petitioner has come forward with the present writ petition praying for the relief as stated therein.
5. Heard Ms.A.Bakkiya Lakshmi, learned counsel for the petitioner.
6. Mr.K.Karthik Jeganath, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr.N.Senthil Selvi, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the fourth respondent. Page No:3/4
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J mvs.
7. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that results will be declared within a week from today.
8. Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3, no further order need to be passed in this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. No costs. 11/1/2023 Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes Speaking/non speaking order mvs.
To
1. The District Collector, Kallakurichi District, Kallakurichi.
2. The Project Director, Rural Development Department Kallakurichi District, Kallakurichi.
3. The Executive Engineer, Kallakurichi District, Kallakurichi.
4. The Block Development Officer (Grama Urachi) Thirunavalur Union, Thirunavalur Kallakurichi District, Kallakurichi.
W.P.No.914 of 2023 Page No:4/4