T.D.Naidu @ Deenadayalan v. The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.01.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.No.28380 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 T.D.Naidu alias Deenadayalan, Son of K.P.Naidu, Chairman D.D.Medical College & Hospital, Kunnavalam at Kunnathur, Tiruvallur District.

... Petitioner/Accused Vs.

1.The State of TamilNadu, Represented by Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tiruvallur, Tiruvallur District.

(Crime No.56 of 2010) 2.P.M.Joshi ... Respondents/Complainant & Defacto Complainant Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., seeking to call for the records in Cr.No.56 of 2010 on the file of the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tiruvallur and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Saravanan For Respondents : Mr.C.Ayyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor for R1

O R D E R

This petition has been filed seeking to call for the records in Cr.No.56 of 2010 on the file of the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tiruvallur and quash the same. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has already paid the entire dues to the defacto complainant in respect of the work done by him and the dispute between the petitioner and defacto complainant was 1/4

settled during the year 2010 itself. Therefore, the petitioner has not committed any offences as alleged in the FIR. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would further submit that, it would suffice, if this Court permits the petitioner to furnish the particulars before the law enforcing agency to prove their innocence and issue direction to the law enforcing agency to complete the investigation within a time frame.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor concedes to the request made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and on instructions, he would further submit that the investigation will be completed within the time frame fixed by this Court.

5.Considering the limited request made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Court without going into the merits of the case, is inclined to issue direction to the law enforcing agency to complete the investigation in Crime No.56 of 2010, after giving opportunity to the petitioner, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to co-operate with the law enforcing agency for early completion of the investigation.

6.This criminal original petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CJ conf) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar mbi To 1.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tiruvallur.

2/4

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104.

Crl.O.P.No.28380 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 sr(co) aa26/02/2020 3/4