Mano @ Manogaran v. State Rep. By

Crl.O.P.No.10397 of 2016 P.KALAIYARASAN, J.

The petitioners, who are arrayed as A2 and A3, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 381 and 511 of IPC, in Crime No.192 of 2016 on the file of the respondent and seek anticipatory bail. 2.Heard both sides.

3.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons; that co-accused have already been granted anticipatory bail and that the petitioners are having permanent residence and therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioners pleaded for grant of anticipatory bail. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that he has no serious objection for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5.Considering the fact that the co-accused have already been granted anticipatory bail and also considering the fact that the petitioners are having permanent residence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

P.KALAIYARASAN,J., Jrl 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of three weeks from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stand dismissed. 05.05.2016 Jrl Crl.O.P.No.10397 of 2016