← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/27253/2009withdrawn dismissed

Mr.Pankaj Kapoor v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2016-09-28Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRDAS

DATE: 28.09.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL.O.P.Nos.27253 & 26659 OF 2009 & M.P.Nos. 1 & 1 of 2009 Mr.Pankaj Kapoor .. Petitioner in CrlOP 27253 of 2009 P.Salman .. Petitioner in CrlOP 26659 of 2009 versus The Sub Inspector of Police, Officer in Charge of Police Station, Nelakottai Police Station, Nilgiris .. Respondent in both petitions Prayer: These petitions are filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records in FIR in Crime No.67 of 2009 on the file of the respondent and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.E.K.Nandakumar, SC for Mr.J.Ravikumar For Respondents : Mr.C.Emalias, Addl.Public Prosecutor COMMON ORDER These petitions are filed, praying to call for the records in FIR in Crime No.67 of 2009 on the file of the respondent and

quash the same.

P.N.PRAKASH, J.

suk

2. Mr.A.R.Sivakumar, Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Ooty, is present today, before this Court.

3. Having heard the exhaustive arguments put forth by both sides, when this Court is about to dismiss the petitions on merits, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition with a liberty, to pursue appropriate remedy after filing the final report, without prejudice to their rights. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

4. Permission as sought for, is granted. Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, these Criminal Original Petitions along with connected Crl.M.Ps. are dismissed as withdrawn. It is needless to state that after filing of the final report, the petitioners are always at liberty to pursue their remedy in the manner known to law. Suk 28.09.2016

CRL.O.P.Nos.27253 & 26659 of 2009