← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/1110/2021dismissed

Sathish Kumar v. State Rep By

2021-02-01Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 01.02.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.OP.No.1110 of 2021 1.Sathish Kumar 2.Arul

...Petitioners

Vs.

State Rep. By The Inspector of Police Arni Taluk Police Station Tiruvannamalai District ...Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.416 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.S.L.Venkatesan For Respondent : Mr.C.Iyyappa Raj Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

(This case has been heard through video conference) The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 379 and 430 IPC and 21(5) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation Act, 1957, in Crime No.416 of 2020, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 06.04.2020, when the Inspector of Police along with his police party was on patrol duty, the petitioners were found illegally transporting one unit of river sand by using van bearing Regn.No.TN20 CE 6014. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that this is the second application for anticipatory bail and the earlier application was dismissed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.16898 of 2020 by order dated 02.11.2020. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioners without obtaining any permission from the Government had illegally dug the land and had transported 1 unit of river sand, thereby degraded the environment and caused damages to the ecology.

He would further submit that there is no previous case against the petitioners. However, he vehemently opposed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. This Court on the earlier occasion in Crl.O.P.No.16898 of 2020 by order dated 02.11.2020, following the orders passed by this Court in a batch of applications in Crl.O.P.No.13334 of 2020 dated 03.09.2020 had dismissed the earlier application expressing the opinion that the offenders despite several orders passed by various Benches of this Court regarding illegal sand mining and knowing fully well about the evil consequences affecting the environment and society at large and the implications thereon are indulging in the offences of illegal quarrying/mining, theft and smuggling of sand and minerals and that finding that the case comes under the category of cases of large magnitude affecting and impacting livelihood of a very large number of people knowingly and unknowingly, had dismissed the earlier application.

Subsequently, the order of this Court in Crl.O.P.No.13334 of 2020 and Batch etc. dated 03.09.2020 was clarified by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court had not agreed with the broad sweep of the observation made by this Court in Paragraph 27 of the order in Crl.O.P.No.13334 of 2020 and connected matters decided on 03.09.2020 and had directed that the Court should take into consideration the role assigned to the person on case to case basis.

6. Accordingly, this Court takes into consideration, the role assigned to the petitioner in the present case. In this case on hand, the role assigned to the petitioners that they have committed theft and transported 1 unit of river sand without any valid permit and commercially exploited the natural resources by using Pocline and Excavator. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 01/02/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARNI TALUK POLICE STATION, TIRUVANAMALAI DISTRICT.

CC to M/S. S.L.VENKATESAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.1110/2021 Date :01/02/2021 RVR 18/02/2021