Madras High CourtSA/627/2001dismissed for default

1.Veerammal v. Arulmigu Mangalagiri Perumal

2018-09-20Honourable Mrs Justice R. Hemalatha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20.09.2018

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA S.A.No.627 of 2001

1. Veerammal

2. Devarasu

3. S.Podaran

4. Jothivelu

5. S.V.Krishnan

6. Perumal

7. M.S.Chinnasamy

8. Jeevanandam

9. Selvaraj 10.Kathiresan 11.Tanthaiah 12.Karuppan 13.Mari 14.Kolandaivelu 15.Chellamuthu 16.Natesan 17.Velayammal 18.Ramasamy 19.Maruthaveeran 20.Nagammal 21.Ramakrishnan 22.Palaniyayee 23.Minor Lakshmi 24.Minor Santhakumar represented by his next friend and natural guardian Palaniyayee.

25.Karthikeyan 26.Velayutham 27.Mangayee 28.Mariyayee 29.Kanthimathi 30.Indrakumar 31.Meenambal ... Appellants /Vs/

1. Arulmighu Mangalagiri Perumal Temple Suriyampalayam Village Erode Taluk Represented by its Heriditary Poojaris, Rangasami Naidu.

For themselves and on behalf of the General Body of Heriditary Poonjaris cum Worshippers.

2. Palani

3. Thanigrass

4. The State of Tamil Nadu represented by the District Collector.

Erode.

5. Velayammal

6. Kathirayee

7. Commissioner Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Chennai.

8. Deputy Commissioner Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Chennai.

9. Assistant Commissioner Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Erode.

10.Executive Officer Arulmighu Mangalagiri Perumal Koil Suriyampalayam.

11.Rajalakshmi 12.Minor Selvakumar 13.Minor Krishnamurthy (respondents 12 & 13 represented by their Guardian and mother Rajalakshmi) ... Respondents

PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., againstthe decree and judgment in A.S.No.24 of 1996 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Erode, dated 08.12.1998, reversing the decree and judgment made in O.S.No.854 of 1983, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Erode, dated 03.01.1995.

For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.S.Jaganathan, for R4 & 7 Government Advocate (CS)

JUDGMENT

When the matter came up for hearing on 19.09.2018, there was no representation for the appellants. Hence the matter was adjourned to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal' on 20.09.2018 i.e., today.

2. Even today, there is no representation for the appellants. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII ) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vkr/dna To 1.The Principal District Munsif Court, Erode. 2.The II Additional District Judge, Erode.

3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.(2 Copies) +1cc to Government Pleader SR.No.65589 S.A.No.627 of 2001 GMY(17/10/2018)