Madras High CourtSA/851/2001dismissed for default

1.Pappathiammal v. Meenakshi Ammal

2020-01-22Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 22.01.2020

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN SA.No.851 of 2001 1.Pappathiammal 2.Kumari Ammal ..Appellants/Defendants Vs.

Meenakshi Ammal ..Respondent/Plaintiff PRAYER:

The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 02.11.1999 in A.S.No.63 of 1999 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Tiruvannamalai confirming the judgment and decree dated 22.03.1999 in O.S.No.840 of 1995 on the file of the Additional District Munsif-I, Tiruvannamalai.

For Appellants : Mr.K.Krishnan for Mr.T.R.Rajaraman For Respondent : Notice served No Appearance

JUDGMENT

The second appeal is directed as against the judgment and decree dated 02.11.1999 in A.S.No.63 of 1999 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Tiruvannamalai confirming the judgment and decree dated 22.03.1999 in O.S.No.840 of 1995 on the file of the Additional District Munsif-I, Tiruvannamalai.

2. The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that he could not contact the parties and reported no instruction. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. It is seen that the same representation was made on several occasions. Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VI) // True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar lok To 1.The Additional District Judge, Tiruvannamalai.

2.The Additional District Munsif-I, Tiruvannamalai.

Copy to: The section Officer, V.R. Section, High Cout, Madras.

SA.No.851 of 2001 SR(CO) CSR: 24.02.2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/