← Library
Madras High CourtCS/914/2008dismissed for default

M/S.Il&Fs Financialservices Lt v. M/S.Inspirisys Solutions Ltd.

2022-07-14Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 14.07.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY C.S. (Comm. Div) No.914 of 2008 M/s.IL&FS Financial Services Limited, "Wescare Towers", III Floor, 16, Cenotaph Road, Teynampet, Chennai-600 018.

... Plaintiff versus M/s.Inspirisys Solution Limited, (Formerly known as M/s.Accel Frontline Ltd.

First Floor, Sowlath Towrs, New Door Nos.57,59,61 & 63 Teylors Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010 (Amended as per order dated 12.09.2019 in A.No.6762 of 2019) ... Defendant Civil Suit is filed under Order IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking judgment and decree seeking a direction to the defendant to pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.1,12,34,158/- (Rupees One Crore Twelve Lakhs Thirty Four Thousand One Hundred and Fifty Eight only) together with interest at 24% per annum on Rs.39,34,277/- from 01.08.2008 till the date of realization.

For Plaintiff :

No appearance For Defendant : Mr.P.V.Balasubramaniam for M/s.BFS Legal

JUDGMENT

By order dated 28.04.2022, notice was issued to the plaintiff in view of the submission of the counsel that he had no further instructions. Pursuant thereto, the bailiff filed a report stating that notice could not be served on the plaintiff, since the plaintiff had vacated from the relevant premises. By recording the same, the Registry was directed to print the name of the plaintiff in the cause list. In spite of doing so, there is no representation for the plaintiff. Therefore, the suit is dismissed for default without any order as to costs.

14.07.2022 Index : Yes/No kal

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J kal C.S. (Comm. Div) No.914 of 2008 14.07.2022