← Library
Madras High CourtSA/475/1996dismissed for default

Chinnaraji Gounder v. Rajamanickam

2016-12-09Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

CORAM

Dated:09.12.2016 THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Second Appeal Nos.475 and 476 of 1996 1.Chinnaraji Gounder .. Appellants / Appellants / 2.Raman Plaintiffs in both appeals /vs/ 1.Rajamanickam 2.Rajakanthan ..Respondents in 3.Raman S.A.No.475 of 1996 1.Rajamanickam 2.Rajakanthan 3.Raman 4.Mangai 5.Murugammal 6.Minor Sendhil 7.Minor Nagamani (Minors 6 & 7 respondents rep.by natural guardian & mother) 8.Minor Elangovan 9.Minor Saravanan (Minors 8 & 9 rep. By thier mother natural guardian 5th respodent) 10.Rani 11.Saradha 12.Kokila 13.Lakshmi 14.Kamalanathan ..Respondents/ Respondents/ 15.Mahendran Plaintiffs in S.A.No.476 of 1996 Prayer in S.A.No.475 of 1996:

Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 31.10.1995 made in A.S.No.126 of 1994 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri against the judgment and decree dated 05.08.1994 made in O.S.No.517 of 1990 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Krishnagiri. Prayer in S.A.No.476 of 1996:

Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 31.10.1995 made in A.S.No.127 of 1994 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri against the judgment and decree dated 05.08.1994 made in O.S.No.442 of 1990 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Krishnagiri. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

For Appellant :

Mr.N.Jawahar (in both cases) For Respondents :

Mr.R.Pream Narayanan for Mrs.Sasikala Subramaniam for R1 to 3 (in both cases) No appearance for R4 to R9, 11 to15 R-10-dismissed on 14.12.2009 [IN SA.476/1996 ] ----- COMMON JUDGMENT The learned counsel appearing for the appellants, in both cases, submits that inspite of informing the appellants requesting instruction, they have not turned up to give instructions. Hence, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants is reporting "no instructions" and to that effect a memo is also filed in both appeals.

2.

In view of the memo filed by the learned counsel appearing for the appellants, these Second Appeals are dismissed for default. No costs.

ari Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS- ) /TRUE COPY/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri 2.The Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri 3.The District Munsif, Krishnagiri.

COPY TO The Section Officer, VR Section, High court, Madras S.A.Nos.475 and 476 of 1996 EV [CO] MSI 12/01/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/