← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/3071/2009dismissed for nonprosecution

Smt S.Vijayalakshmi v. M/S Shriram Chits Tamilnadu

2019-10-16Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16.10.2019 CORAM :

The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY and M.P.Nos.1 to 1 of 2009 S.Vijayalakshmi ... Petitioner in all the 3 C.R.Ps Vs.

1.M/s.Shriram Chits Tamil Nadu (P) Ltd., Tondiarpet Branch, Chennai - 600 002.

... 1st Respondent in all the 3 C.R.Ps 2.Junior Agnaiya 3.V.Nirmala 4.M.Srinivasan ... Respondents 2 to 4 in C.R.P.No.3071 of 2009 2.A.Hendry 3.D.Balaji 4.A.Govindaraj ... Respondents 2 to 4 in C.R.P.No.3072 of 2009 2.C.Uthannamurthy 3.C.Vasudevan ... Respondents 2 & 3 in C.R.P.No.3073 of 2009 C.R.P.No.3071 of 2009 filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order passed in E.P.No.1738 of 2006 in A.R.C.No.1240 of 2004 on 25.03.2008 passed by the X Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

Page 1 / 4

C.R.P.No.3072 of 2009 filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order passed in E.P.No.2985 of 2006 in A.R.C.No.710 of 2004 on 22.02.2007 passed by the IX Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

C.R.P.No.3073 of 2009 filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order passed in E.P.No.2460 of 2007 in A.R.C.No.1660 of 2004 on 24.03.2008 passed by the X Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Murugan - no appearance - in all 3 C.R.Ps For Respondents : Mr.K.V.Ananthakrushnan (R1 - in all 3 C.R.Ps) R3 & R4 - no appearance (C.R.P.No.3071/2009) R2 - not ready in notice (C.R.P.No.3071/2009) R2 & R3 - No appearance (C.R.P.No.3072/2009) R4 - refused (C.R.P.No.3072/2009) R2 & R3 - No appearance (C.R.P.No.3073/2009) C O M M O N O R D E R When the matter was listed for hearing on 14.10.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was adjourned to 15.10.2019. On 15.10.2019 also, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption "for dismissal" on 16.10.2019. Though the matter has been listed under the caption "for dismissal", today also there is no representation for Page 2 / 4

the petitioner. Hence, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the Civil Revision Petitions for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Index : Yes/No 16.10.2019 va To 1.The IX Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. 2.The X Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. Page 3 / 4

M. DURAISWAMY,J.

va and M.P.Nos.1 to 1 of 2009 16.10.2019 Page 4 / 4