← Library
Madras High CourtWP/2490/2023withdrawn dismissed

R.Boopathi v. M/S.Flowlink System Pvt Ltd

2023-02-02Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.02.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH W.P Nos.2490, 2493, 2497 &2503 of 2023 and WMP Nos.2601, 2598, 2595 & 2588 of 2023 W.P.No.2490 of 2023 R.Boopathi Petitioner vs.

M/s.Flowlink Systems Pvt Ltd., Rep. by its Authorized Signatory, N.Govindarajan, Managing Director, Uthapalayam Road, Arasur, Coimbatore - 641 407.

Respondent W.P.No.2493 of 2023 1.M.Subramaniam 2.D.Krishnaveni 3.D.Richkumar Petitioner vs.

1.M/s.Flowlink Systems Pvt Ltd., Rep. by its Authorized Signatory, N.Govindarajan, Managing Director, Uthapalayam Road, Arasur, Coimbatore - 641 407.

2.R.Mani

3.G.Marimuthu Respondents W.P.No.2497 of 2023 1.J.Shanmugasundaram 2.P.Selvavelmurugan Petitioners vs.

M/s.Flowlink Systems Pvt Ltd., Rep. by its Authorized Signatory, N.Govindarajan, Managing Director, Uthapalayam Road, Arasur, Coimbatore - 641 407.

Respondent W.P.No.2503 of 2023 K.Muthumani Petitioner vs.

M/s.Flowlink Systems Pvt Ltd., Rep. by its Authorized Signatory, N.Govindarajan, Managing Director, Uthapalayam Road, Arasur, Coimbatore - 641 407.

Respondent Common Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the order dated 03.10.2022 passed in I.A. No. 1 of 2022 in A.P. No. 43 of 2013, I.A. No. 2 of 2022 in A.P. No.36 of 2013, I.A. No. 2 of 2022 in A.P. No.41 of 2013 and I.A. No. 2 of 2022 in A.P. No.42 of 2013 from the file of the Industrial Tribunal, Chennai and quash the same as illegal and

consequently direct the Industrial Tribunal, Chennai to reopen the case to enable the petitioner to examine and cross examine the respondent For Petitioner : Ms.E.Akila

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these writ petitions. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 02.02.2023 Index : Yes/No (3/3) Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order : Yes/No ssr To The Industrial Tribunal, Chennai

N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.

ssr W.P Nos.2490, 2493, 2497 &2503 of 2023 and WMP Nos.2601, 2598, 2595 & 2588 of 2023 02.02.2023 (3/3)