Metropolitan Transport v. S.Srimathy
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI CMA.No.1994 of 2012:
Metropolitan Transport Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, No.2, Pallavan Salai, Chennai - 600 002.
...Appellant Vs.
S.Srimathy Minor J.Maloann Minor rep. by his Natural Guardian & Mother, the 1st respondent Vasantha J.V.Kumar Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Surface Transport, New Delhi.
6.
State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Transport Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 5.
7.
Director General of Police, Chennai.
...Respondents
1/5
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of MV Act, 1988 as against the fair and decreetal order dated 12.10.2010 passed in MCOP.No.60 of 2008 by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chengalpattu.
CMA.No.3264 of 2014:
The Superintendent of Police, Salem.
State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by District Collector, Salem.
...Appellants Vs.
Dhanam Minor Sewetha Minor rep. by his Natural Guardian & Mother/the 1st respondent herein. Padmavathi Lakshmi Devi Minor Kiruthika Respondents 2 & 5 are rep. by next friend and mother 1st respondent Dhanam.
6.
Parruk Bahsa 7.
Sayeed Sabeer 8.
United India Insurance Company, Oriental Complex, T.No.77, A.A. Street, Salem.
9.
P.Subramani
...Respondents
2/5
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of MV Act, 1988 as against the order and decreetal order dated 06.12.2007 made in MCOP.No.147 of 2005 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/ Addl. District Judge, Dharmapuri.
In CMA.No.1994 of 2012:
For Appellant : Mr.S.S.Swaminathan For Respondent : Mr.D.Gopal, GA, for R6 & R7 In CMA.No.3264 of 2014:
For Appellants : Mr.D.Gopal, GA For Respondent : Mr.Danush for M/s. G.Bala & Daisy, for R3 COMMON ORDER This Court, vide orders both dated 07.09.2016, while disposing of the appeals by issuing directions with regard to payment, had sought for certain details, vide its earlier order dated 10.07.2014, for which alone the appeals were kept on file. However, till date, the said details sought for by this Court had not been placed before this Court. Only in the interest of public the details were sought for. However, at this distant point of time, after a lapse 3/5
of more than a decade, it would not be in the interest of justice to keep the appeals on file.
2. Accordingly, for the reason aforesaid, no further order is required to be passed in these Appeals.
12.11.2024 skt To:
The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chengalpattu.
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Addl. District Judge, Dharmapuri.
Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Surface Transport, New Delhi.
State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Transport Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 5.
Director General of Police, Chennai.
4/5
M.DHANDAPANI, J.
skt 12.11.2024 5/5