Tamilvanan v. The State Rep By The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20.01.2022

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Crl.O.P.No.1185 of 2022 1.Tamilvanan 2.Karthick ... Petitioners Vs.

The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Krishnagiri Town Police Station, Krishnagiri District.

(Crime No.10 of 2022) ... Respondent/complainant Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioners on Anticipatory Bail in the event of their arrest in Cr.No.10 of 2022 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioners : Mr.E.Kannadasan For Respondent : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 379 of IPC in Crime No.10 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 08.01.2022, when the respondent police were on the regular checking of vehicles, they found that the petitioners have illegally transported two pieces of granite stone by using Tipper lorry without any valid bills and permit. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that the petitioner are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. However, on instructions, the

learned counsel further submits that the petitioners, on their own volition, are ready and willing to contribute a sum of Rs.50,000/- for the purpose of improving and maintaining the Government Schools. Hence, he seeks for grant of bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent opposed for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners by stating that the petitioners have illegally transported 2 pieces of granite stone worth about a sum of rupees two lakhs without any valid bill and permit.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submissions made by the both counsel and also the fact that the petitioners have willfully and on their own volition agreed to contribute a sum of Rs.50,000/- for charitable purpose, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days after lifting of lockdown or the commencement of the Court's normal functioning whichever is earlier, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Krishnagiri, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a) the petitioners shall make a non-refundable deposit of Rs.1,00,000/- to the credit of " The Chief Educational Officer, Krishnagiri District, for the rehabilitation and improvement of the basic needs of the Government Schools in the said District under necessary acknowledgment without prejudice to their defence before the trial court and submit proof of payment of the said amount before the aforesaid learned Judicial Magistrate, who after perusing the receipt/acknowledgment shall accept the sureties furnished by the petitioners within a period of fifteen (15) days after lifting of lockdown or the commencement of the Court's normal functioning whichever is earlier and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below;

[b] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[c] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police every Wednesday at 10.30 a.m for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and when required for an interrogation;

[d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[f] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions has been imposed and the petitioners are released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

[g] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC;

-sd/- 20/01/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, KRISHNAGIRI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KRISHNAGIRI [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KRISHNAGIRI TOWN POLICE STATION, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

5 THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT.

CC to E.KANNADASAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.1185/2022 Date :20/01/2022 JPA 27/01/2022