T.Jeyasekar, v. The Principal Secretary/

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 30.11.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH and THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.A.No.2800 of 2012 & M.P.Nos.1 of 2012 & 1 of 2013 T.Jayhasekar ... Appellant Vs.

1.The Principal Secretary/Commissioner of Survey and Settlement, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

2.The Deputy Director of Survey and Land Records, Madurai.

3.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

... Respondents Writ Appeal is preferred under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 30.08.2012 made in W.P.No.23675 of 2012 Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandams,Calling for the records of the first respondent, relating to the orders in Pro.Na.Ka. No.Ra.2/ 26476/2012/Ni.Aa. dated 13.8.2012 to quash the same and to issue consequential directions to the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue to serve in the same post/ station For Appellant : Mr.M.Ravi For respondents : Mrs.A.Sri Jayanthi, Special Government Pleader https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH,J.) When the writ appeal is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that in view of the subsequent development, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ appeal and has become infructuous.

2. In view of the above submission, the writ appeal stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS vi) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar raa To 1.The Principal Secretary/Commissioner of Survey and Settlement, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

2.The Deputy Director of Survey and Land Records, Madurai.

3.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

+1 CC TO GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR.NO. 82611 W.A.No.2800 of 2012 ASK(09/01/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/