Squash Rackets Federation v. Indian Squash Association

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08.09.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN C.R.P.Nos.665 & 666 of 2009 1.The Squash Rackets Federation of India, Registered Office at Dhun Building, 3rd Floor, North Wing, 827, Anna Salai, Chennai - 2.

Represented by its Secretary General.

2.Tamil Nadu Squash Rackets Association, Registered Office at Dhun Building, 3rd Floor, North Wing, 827, Anna Salai, Chennai.

Represented by its Secretary General. ... Petitioner in both C.R.Ps Vs 1.Indian Squash Association Represented by Hon'ble Secretary A.I.Singh Lube Tradeways Registered Office at Plot No.2, Industrial Area - 1, Chandigar.

2.Squash Rackets Federation of Delhi Registered Office No.J 405 Sam Vihar RK Puram, NEw Delhi - 22.

Represented by its Secretary Rahul Kumar.

3.Chandigarh Squash Association, Represented by its Hon'ble Secretary Amitoj Inder Singh, No.2, Industrial Area, Chandigarh - 160 002.

Page No: 1/4

4.A.I.Singh ... Respondents in both the C.R.Ps PRAYER:-Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against fair and decreetal order, dated 22.12.2008 passed in I.A.No.21499 of 2008 in I.A.No.6978 of 2008 and I.A.No. 21500 of 2008 in and O.S.No.3804 of 2005 by the II-Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

For Petitioner in both C.R.Ps : Mr.G.R.Lakshmanan For Respondents in both C.R.Ps : Ms.D.Geetha COMMON ORDER These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed to set aside the fair and decreetal order, dated 22.12.2008 passed in I.A.No.21499 of 2008 in I.A.No.6978 of 2008 and I.A.No. 21500 of 2008 in and O.S.No.3804 of 2005 by the II-Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. 2.

The entire bundles, having been lost by the Registry, the same were reconstructed. The arguments of the learned counsels appearing on both side were called upon to argue the matter. Page No: 2/4

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that nothing survives for further adjudication in these cases and therefore, the above Civil Revision Petitions have become infructuous. The learned counsel had also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

4. Recording the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner(s), these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

08.09.2023 gba Index: Yes/ No Speaking order: Yes/ No Page No: 3/4

V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J.

Gba To The Additional District & Session FTC - V, Chennai.

C.R.P.Nos.665 & 666 of 2009 08.09.2023 (2/2) Page No: 4/4