Madras High CourtCRL OP/1103/2019disposed of

Premkumar v. The State Rep By

2019-01-11Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:11.01.2019

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P.No.1103 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.No.712 of 2019 Premkumar ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The State rep. by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Madhavaram, Chennai.

2.T.Devi

...Respondents

Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records relating to Crime No. 5 of 2018 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same in respect of the petitioner / Accused and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Ragavendran For Respondent 1 : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor for R1

O R D E R

This petition has been filed seeking to quash the FIR in Crime No. 5 of 2018, pending on the file of the first respondent police.

2. It is seen from allegations made in the complaint that there was an affair between the petitioner and the second respondent. After some time, due to some mis-understanding, the relationship got snapped.

3. The second respondent has given a complaint to the respondent police stating that the petitioner taking advantage of the relationship, had physical relationship with the second respondent and subsequently refused to marry the second respondent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner came to know that the second respondent has relationship with some other persons also and when an attempt was made to settle the issue, the second respondent demanded Rs.15,00,000/- and therefore, a complaint has also been given to the very same respondent police and Complaint No.821 was registered and the same is kept pending.

5. In view of the above, this criminal original petition stands disposed of, with a direction to the first respondent to enquire both the complaint given by the petitioner as well as the FIR registered based on the compliant given by the second respondent and take an appropriate decision in accordance with law. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar nmm/dss To 1.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Madhavaram, Chennai.

2.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

Crl.O.P.No.1103 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.No.712 of 2019 GSP(07/02/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/