Manikandan, v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 31.01.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.No.13566 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 Manikannan ...

Petitioner Vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer Chidambaram, Cuddalore District.

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Srimushnam Police Station, Srimushnam, Cuddalore District.

3.Manivasagam ...

Respondents (R3 impleaded as per order dated 30.04.2012 in M.P.2/2012) Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 21.04.2012 within 2 weeks from today.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Sivagnanasambandan For Respondent : Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari Nos.1 & 2 Additional Govt.Pleader Respondent No.3 : Dismissed vide order dated 15.12.2014

ORDER

It is represented by the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 & 2 that the subject vehicle has already been returned back to the owner of the vehicle. Since the vehicle has already been returned back to the owner of the vehicle, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition as the relief sought for is only against the said vehicle. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sms To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer Chidambaram, Cuddalore District.

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Srimushnam Police Station, Srimushnam, Cuddalore District.

+1cc to the Government Pleader SR.8599 W.P.No.13566 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 PA(CO) CB(04/03/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/