Professor Sunil Mukhi v. Saveetha Institute Of Medical And Technical Sciences

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09.02.2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL A No. 682 of 2026 in C.S.No.100 of 2025 Professor Sunil Mukhi Board Members India Research Watch C702, Mount Vert Dieu, Pashan Sus Road, Pune 411 021, Maharashtra.

..Applicant Vs

1. Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS) Represented by its Registrar, Mrs.Sheeja S.Varghese, Having an office at AC-109, 2nd Street, Shanthi Colony, Anna Nagar, Chennai - 600 040.

2.India Research Watch Represented by its Founder Dr.Achal Agarwal, Faculty, Applied Mathematics, Sitare University, SRMCEM Campus, Lucknow Faizabad Road, Lucknow 226 010 Uttar Pradesh.

3.Dr.Achal Agarwal Faculty, Applied Mathematics, Sitare University, SRMCEM Campus, Lucknow Faizabad Road, Lucknow 226 010 Uttar Pradesh.

__________Page 1 of 4

4.Professor S.C.Lakhotia Board Members India Research Watch, P3/4, Ravindra Puri, Lane NO.13, Varanasi 221 005, Uttar Pradesh.

5.Dr.Ganesh Natarajan Board Members India Research Watch, 9, Sri Padmam, Lakshmi Apartments, Pallath Lane, Punkunnam PO Trichur - 682 002, Kerala 6.Dr.Shashi Kant Shankar Assistant Professor, School of Arts and Sciences, Ahmedabad University, Gujarat - 380 009.

7.Retraction Watch 121W, 36th Street, Suite 209, New York, NY 10018, USA.

... Respondents Prayer:

Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Madras High Court Original Side Rules read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 44 days in filing the adoption memo on behalf of the Applicant herein in C.S.No.100 of 2025 and take the same on record. For Applicant:

Ms.Ashwini Vaidialingam For Respondents:

Mr.N.K.Susruthan for Ms.Kavya Silambanan

ORDER

This application has been filed applicant / petitioner to condone the delay of 44 days in filing the adoption Memo on behalf of the Applicant/3rd defendant.

__________Page 2 of 4

2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no serious objection in allowing the application.

3. Heard the learned counsel on both sides and perused the documents placed on record.

4. Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the application and the facts and circumstances of the case and also in view of no objection having been stated by the learned counsel appearing on other side, this application is allowed and the delay of 44 days in filing the adoption Memo is recorded.

09.02.2026 (1/2) arr __________Page 3 of 4

P.DHANABAL, J.

arr 09.02.2026 __________Page 4 of 4