Minor Ramya v. Venkatachalam

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02.07.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA CRP(NPD).No.2987 of 2010 1.Minor Ramya 2.Minor Priya ...Petitioners (Minor Petitioners represented by next friend Arunthathi) vs.

1.Venkatachalam 2.Kannan 3.Sampath 4.Gopu 5.Kavitha 6.The District Registrar, Cuddalore.

7.The Sub-Registrar, Vadalur.

... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure against the fair and decreetal order dated 17.11.2004 in CMA.No.10 of 2004 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore upholding the fair and decreetal order dated 29.08.2003 in IA.No.44 of 2003

in OS.No.539 of 2000 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore. For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.S.Jaganathan (CS), Government Advocate for R6 and R7 No appearance for R1 to R5

O R D E R

When the Civil Revision Petition came up for hearing on 21.06.2019, there was no representation for the revision petitioners and hence was directed to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal' on 24.06.2019. Subsequently, on the next hearing dates 24.06.2019 and 01.07.2019, the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners sought time to produce the Judgment in OS.No.539 of 2000 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore. The learned counsel for the sixth and seventh respondents is present.

2. However, when the Civil Revision Petition was taken up today, ie., 02.07.2019 there is no representation for the revision petitioners. In the facts and circumstances, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No costs.

02.07.2019 mbi

Index : Yes/No To 1.The Principal Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore.

2.The Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore.

R.HEMALATHA, J.

mbi CRP(NPD).No.2987 of 2010 02.07.2019