D.Kumaresan, v. The Commanding Officer,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 17.09.2018

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA W.P.No.6062 of 2014 D.Kumaresan ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Commanding Officer, URC, INS Rajali, Arakkonam - 631 006.

2. Union of India, Rep. by Deputy Director General Canteen Services, Quarter Master General Branch, Army Headquarters L-Block, Room No.16, Church Road, New Delhi.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent herein to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 14.08.2013 and pass appropriate orders directing the respondents to confirm or re-designate the status of the petitioner as Store Keeper of the 1st respondent Unit Run Canteen and accordingly, direct the payment of salary and allowances due to the petitioner from 04.01.2001 in the scale of pay applicable to the post of Store Keeper namely 4000-100-6000 as per the rules in force dated 28.04.2013.

For Petitioner :

Mr.S.Sadasharam For Respondents :

Mr.K.B.Arul

O R D E R

The prayer in the writ petition is to direct the 2nd respondent herein to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 14.08.2013 and pass appropriate orders directing the respondent to confirm or re-designate the status of the petitioner as Store Keeper of the 1st respondent Unit Run Canteen and accordingly, to direct the payment of salary and allowances due to the petitioner from 04.01.2001 in the scale of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

pay applicable to the post of Store Keeper, namely, 4000-1006000 as per the rules in force dated 28.04.2013.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the representation of the petitioner dated 14.08.2013 has been rejected by the first respondent herein, by order dated 14.09.2018. He has also produced a copy of the order dated 14.09.2018 before this Court.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also conceded that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. She has also made an endorsement to that effect.

4. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and recording the said endorsement, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Commanding Officer, URC, INS Rajali, Arakkonam - 631 006.

2. Union of India, Rep. by Deputy Director General Canteen Services, Quarter Master General Branch, Army Headquarters L-Block, Room No.16, Church Road, New Delhi.

+1cc to Mr.K.B.Arul, Advocate Sr.64308 W.P.No.6062 of 2014 rsi[co] srg 25/10/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/