Dr.Vijayakumar v. Chairmansami

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13.06.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA CRP(PD).No.3437 of 2010 and MP.No.1 of 2010 1.Dr.Vijayakumar 2.V.Rathi @ Rathimala ... Petitioners vs.

1.Chairmansami 2.Chennai Corporation, Rep by its Commissioner, Park Town, Chennai-03. ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 29.03.2010 passed in IA.No.13899 of 2008 in OS.No.4310 of 2003 on the file of the XV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.A.Mohankrishnan for Mr.H.Nazirundeen

O R D E R

No representation for the revision petitioners.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents contended that this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous, since, the suit OS.No.4310 of 2003, on the file of the learned XV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai has already been dismissed. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

3. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, this Civil Revision Petitions is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.

13.06.2019 mbi Index : Yes/No To

1.The XV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

2.The Commissioner, Chennai Corporation, Park Town, Chennai-03.

R.HEMALATHA, J.

mbi CRP(PD).No.3437 of 2010 and MP.No.1 of 2010 13.06.2019