Mrs.P.Manjula v. Mrs.S.Pappa Bai And 4 Others

A.No.664 of 2021 in C.S.No.416 of 2018 A.No.664 of 2021 in C.S.No.416 of 2018 R.PONGIAPPAN, J., The plaintiff in C.S.No.416 of 2018 has filed this application, seeking for the relief to receive the additional documents, which was not filed at the time of filing the plaint.

2. Heard both sides.

3. In general, if the documents produced at the later point of time, they have to be received, subject to proof and relevancy. Though the learned counsel for the respondents raised objections for receiving the documents, considering the fact that he is having the opportunity to raise his objections during the time of marking the documents, as exhibits. His objections cannot be taken into account for considering the prayer sought for by the applicant.

4. Therefore, in view of the above, this application is allowed. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

A.No.664 of 2021 in C.S.No.416 of 2018 R.PONGIAPPAN, J.

sri

5. Registry is directed to receive the documents, now enclosed along with this application, subject to proof and relevancy. 24.02.2021 sri A.No.664 of 2021 in C.S.No.416 of 2018 [1/2] 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/