Sudakar v. Thenmozhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 22.09.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN Crl.OP.No.28187/2015 & MP.Nos.1&2/2015 [Video Conferencing] 1.Sudakar 2.Pakkirisamy 3.Jayalakshmi 4.Gothandaraman 5.Velayutham 6.Rajagopal 7.Muthulakshmi 8.Vijayakumar 9.Anand 10.Gandhimathi

...Petitioners

Versus

Thenmozhi

...Respondent

Prayer : - Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C to call for the records in connection with the CMP No.8372/2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruthuraipoondi and quash the same.

For Petitioners :

No appearance For Respondent :

Mr.S.Arivazhagan

ORDER

(1) A learned Single Judge of this Court in a batch of cases in Crl.O.P.No.28458/2019 etc., batch, [Dr.Padmanathan and Others Vs. Tmt. Monica and Others] vide common order dated https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

18.01.2021, had very categorically held that any proceedings questioning the pendency of complaints preferred under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, should only be preferred as a Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and that the petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., would not lie and the same is not maintainable. (2) Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions stand closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-VII) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar AP To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Thiruthuraipoondi.

2.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Chennai.

+1cc to M/s.S.Arivazhagan, Advocate SR.No.48427 Crl.OP.No.28187 of 2015 GMI(CO) RVM(12/10/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/