A.Ikram Hussain v. The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police,

CRL OP NO. 1088 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22-01-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL OP NO. 1088 of 2025 A.Ikram Hussain Son of Asak Hussain, Post Graduate Medical Student, Government Medical College Hospital, Tiruvannamalai.

Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s):

Nandhagopal Dhanapal A.Mohamedyusuff M.Yesudasan L.P.Mounish For Respondent(s):

S.Santhosh Government Advocate (criminal Side) Madras High Court.

ORDER

The petitioner apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 65 B in Crime No. Not known of 2025, seek anticipatorybail.

2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petitioner enquiry is pending.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances, the respondent police has to issue notice under Section 35 of BNSS to the petitioner and the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police and the Investigating Officer has to conduct the enquiry by strictly following the procedures therein and if any prima facie case is made out against the petitioners, register the F.I.R or close the petition enquiry within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The parties are directed to cooperate with the enquiry. It is needless to say that the respondent police shall not take any coercive steps to secure the accused till the completion of enquiry on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant.

5. With the above directions, this criminal original petition is disposed of. 22-01-2025 msv To The Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis