B.T.Gopalakrishnan v. The Security Commissioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.06.2026 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR B.T.Gopalakrishnan .. Petitioner

Versus

The Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, Integral Coach Factory, Chennai - 38.

.. Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.V.Jothi Shankar, for Mr.P.Rajendran For Respondent : Ms.T.P.Savitha

ORDER

When the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing, Mr.V.Jothi Shankar, learned Counsel representing Mr.P.Rajendran, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration and the Writ Petition becomes infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. 1/3

2. In view of the above submission made, this Writ Petition is closed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 02.06.2026 Index : yes/no Speaking order/Non-speaking order : yes/no grs To The Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, Integral Coach Factory, Chennai - 38.

2/3

T.VINOD KUMAR, J.

grs 02.06.2026 3/3