Badrinarayanan v. Arumugam

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 19.06.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA CRP(NPD).No.1228 of 2003 and CRP(PD).No.1229 of 2003 Badrinarayanan ... Petitioner in both CRPs.

vs.

1.Arumugam 2.R.Elango ... Respondents in CRP.No.1228 of 2003 R.Elango ... Respondent in CRP.No.1229 of 2003 Prayer in CRP.No.1228 of 2003: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the adjournment order dated 07.07.2003 in EP.No.1 of 2003 in RCOP.No.10 of 2001 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Cuddalore.

Prayer in CRP.No.1229 of 2003: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 30.05.2002 in O.S.No.213 of 2002 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Cuddalore.

For Petitioner in both CRPs : Mrs.R.Meenal For Respondents in both CRPs : No appearance C O M M O N O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner in both the Civil Revision Petitions contended that both the petitions have become infructuous. She has also made an endorsement to that effect.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mbi To The Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore.

+1 cc to M/s.R.Meenal, Advocate, S.R.No.50407 CRP(NPD).No.1228 of 2003 and CRP(PD).No.1229 of 2003 NRJK(CO) SSM(18/07/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/