← Library
Madras High CourtWP/2363/2026disposed of with direction

V.Shanthi v. The State Of Tamilnadu

2026-01-29Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29-01-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI V.Shanthi W/o.Karthikeyan, No.3-123,Gandhi Nagar, Puthur Village, Manajakollai Post, Nagapattinam.

..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep by its Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai- 600 009.

2. The Director of School Education DPI Campus, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai.

3. The Chief Educational Officer Office of The Chief Educational Office,

4. The District Educational Officer Office of The District Educational Office,

5. The Correspondent Kumaran High School, Manjakollai, ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking to issue a Writ of mandamus, directing the 3rd and 4th respondents herein to regularize the petitioner's service as Record Clerk with 5th respondent school from the date of joining i.e 16.03.2011 and consequently, directing the respondents to provide all benefits to the petitioner with retrospective effect from the date of joining with the 5th respondent school. For Petitioner(s):

Mr. T.Ananthasekar For Respondent(s):

Ms.Mythreye Chandru Special Government Pleader for R1 to R4 R5- Notice dispensed with

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 3rd and 4th respondents herein to regularize the petitioner's service as Record Clerk in the 5th respondent school from the date of joining i.e 16.03.2011 and consequently to direct the respondents to provide all attendant benefits to the

petitioner with retrospective effect from the date of joining in the 5th respondent school.

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been working as a Record Clerk in the 5th respondent school since the year 2011. However, her services have not been regularised till date. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed.

3.Since no adverse order has been passed against the 5th respondent, notice to the 5th respondent is dispensed with. 4.The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 would submit that if the petitioner makes a representation within a period of two weeks, the same will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed.

5. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to make an appropriate representation to the 3rd respondent, along with the proposal of the 5th respondent, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy

of this order. Upon receipt of such representation, the 3rd respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks thereafter.

6. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 29-01-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order UMA To

1. The Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai- 600 009.

2. The Director of School Education DPI campus, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai.

3. The Chief Educational Officer Office of The Chief Educational Office,

4. The Disrict Educational Officer Office of The District Educational Office,

5. The Correspondent Kumaran High School, Manjakollai,

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

uma 29-01-2026