← Library
Madras High CourtWP/20011/2002dismissed as infructuous

S.Mukundan Thampi v. Managing Director

2019-02-07Honourable Mr Justice M.S. Ramesh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS

DATED: 07.02.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH WP.No.20011 of 2002 and WP.MP.No.27620 of 2002 S.Mukundan Thampi

...Petitioner

Vs Managing Director, TWAD Board, 31, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai - 5.

...Respondent

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ, or order or direction more in the nature of a Writ of certiorari, against the respondent to call for records and strike down BP.Ms.No.54 dated 07.02.2002 issued by the respondent. For Petitioner : Ms.M.Santhanamari for Mr.E.J.Ayyappan For Respondent : Mrs.S.Thamizharasi,SC

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer in the Writ Petition has become infructuous and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw the present Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. Recording the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

hvk To Managing Director, TWAD Board, 31, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai - 5.

+1cc to Mrs.S.Thamizharasi , Advocate SR.No. 10630 WP.No.20011 of 2002 and WP.MP.No.27620 of 2002 A.SK(05/03/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/