Cauvery v. R.Latha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.10.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN C.M.A.No. 3161 of 2011 1.Cauvery 2.Poongothai ... Appellants (Cause title accepted vide order of this court dated 27.09.2011 made in MP.No.1/2011 in CMA.Sr.68835/2011) Vs 1.R.Latha 2.R.Kalaivani 3.The District Collector, District Collectorate Office, Nagapattinam.

... Respondents Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed under Order 43 Rule 1 of CPC, against the fair and decreetal order made in P.O.P. No.13 of 2009 dated 20.06.2011 on the file of the District Judge, Nagapattinam.

For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance for R1 & R3 : R2 - Dismissed vide order dated 14.10.2015

JUDGMENT

There is no representation for the appellants when the case was called in the forenoon. Again it was called in the afternoon, there is no representation for the appellants. It appears that the appellants are not interested in pursuing the appeal.

1/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

-s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar arb To 1.The District Judge, Nagapattinam.

2. The Section Officer, Vernacular Section, Madras High Court.

C.M.A.No. 3161 of 2011 pa(co) aa05/11/2019 2/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/