Vasudevan M v. The Tahsidlar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.01.2026 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Vasudevan.M ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Tahsildar, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District.

2.The Head Surveyor, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Polur Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. 4.Ravindran 5.Sudhakar 6.Vinayagam ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to survey the petitioner's property in survey number 147/1B and 148/1B measuring an extent of 0.01.50 Ares and 0.01.00 Ares in Patta No.612, respectively situated at Kalppattu Village, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannaalai District and fix its boundaries as per the Sale deed No:803/2011 by obtaining adequate police protection from the 3rd respondent, within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arun Kumar For Respondents : Mr.R.P.Murugan Government Advocate [R1 & R2] Page No.1 of 4

Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal Government Advocate (Crl.Side) [R3] Notice dispensed with [R4 to R6] *****

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his online application, dated 11.11.2025, with the assistance of the 3rd respondent, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. The petitioner had submitted an application through on-line on 11.11.2025 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered by the official respondents till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3. Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), accepts notice on behalf of the 3rd respondent. Since no adverse order has been passed against the respondents 3 to 6 in this writ petition, notice to the respondents 3 to 6 is dispensed with by this Court.

4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the 2nd respondent is directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's Page No.2 of 4

property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections, if any, from the respondents 3 to 6, the neighbouring land owners and any other party as they deem fit, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:- (a) Before surveying the lands in question, the 2nd respondent is directed to issue notice to the respondents 3 to 6, the neighbouring land owners, and also to any other party, if they deem fit to put on notice.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the 2nd respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, with the assistance of the 3rd respondent, if required, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (c) There shall be no order as to costs.

28.01.2026 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order sp To 1.The Tahsildar, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. 2.The Head Surveyor, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Polur Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. Page No.3 of 4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

sp 28.01.2026 Page No.4 of 4