← Library
Madras High CourtCONT P/191/2021closed

M.Chokkalingam v. Pradeep Yadav Ias

2021-10-25Honourable Mr Justice M.S. Ramesh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 25.10.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH M.Chokkalingam, No.4/174, Srisairam Avenue, Raojastreet, Moulivakkam, Porur, Chennai 600 125 .. Petitioner Vs.

1. Pradeep Yadav, I.A.S., Chairman, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Anna Salai, Chennai 2

2. Er.A.Ashokkumar Chief Engineer(Personnel), Tamilnadu Electricity Board, 800 , Anna Salai, Chennai 2

3. Er.A.Sekar, The Superintending Engineer, Kanchi Electricity Distribution Circle, Anna Maaligai/Olimuhamedpet, Kanchipuram-2 ... Respondents Prayer:- Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act praying to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the Order of this Court in W.P.No.11370 of 2005 dated 14.03.2019. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Vediappan for Mr.P.Ganesan For Respondents : Mr.P.Subramanian Standing counsel, T.N.E.B.

****** 1/3

O R D E R

Pursuant to the order of this Court, dated 14.3.2019, it is stated that TANGEDCO had issued proceedings, dated 16.11.2019 whereby it is claimed that the petitioner has been placed immediately above his Junior in the panel, which aspect is disputed by the counsel appearing for the petitioner. However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that in connection to the said proceedings, the respondents have also sought for an option for fixation of pay from the petitioner and in his representation, dated 15.4.2021, he had also given his option for ''fixation of pay at the next higher stage on the date of promotion and for re-fixation of pay under Regulation 33 (b) of Tamilnadu Electricity Service Regulations on the date of accrual of increment in the lower post''.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that he would be satisfied if the respondents are directed to consider his representation, dated 15.4.2021 wherein he has claimed his option and for such consideration he is not pressing the contempt petition for the present.

3. In the light of the submission made by the counsel appearing for the petitioner, the contempt petition stands closed with a direction to the Superintending Engineer, Kancheepuram Electricity Distribution Circle, Kancheepuram to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 15.4.2021 and pass 2/3

orders within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. No costs.

SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) vaan //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2022. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

GS/21/02/2022 3/3