Madras High CourtCRP NPD/279/2006dismissed for nonprosecution

A.Prabhavathi, v. T.Rajagopal,

2019-04-26Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 26.04.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE THIRU JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY C.R.P.(NPD)No.279 & 280 of 2006 A.Prabhavathi ... Petitioner/Petitioner/Petitioner /4th Respondent/4th Defendant in both CRPs v.

1. T.Rajagopal 2.T.Duraisamy 3.G.Balasubramaniam 4.C.D.Rajagopal ... Respondents/Respondents/Plaintiffs in CRP No.279/2006

1. T.Rajagopal

2. G.Balasubramaniam 3.Thilakavathy 4.Pasupathi 5.Kazhanamala 5.Maduravani 7.Savithri 8.Radha 9.Lakshmi ... Respondents/Respondents/Plaintiff in CRP No.280/2006 C.R.P.(NPD)No.279/2006 :- Civil Revision Petition filed under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code against the order and decreetal order dated 26.03.2004 made in I.A.No.1176 of 2002 in I.A.No.2680 of 1991 in O.S.No.853 of 1984 on the file of District Munsif, Tiruppur.

C.R.P.(NPD)No.280/2006 :- Civil Revision Petition filed under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code against the order and decreetal order dated 26.03.2004 made in I.A.No.1180 of 2002 in I.A.No.37 of 1994 in O.S.No.310 of 1993 on the file of District Munsif, Tiruppur.

For Petitioners : No Appearance (in both CRPs) For Respondents in C.R.P. No.279/2006 : R1 to R4- died (steps due) For Respondents in C.R.P. No.280/2006 : R1, R2 & R9- died (steps due) Not Ready in Notice - R3, R4, R5, R6, R7 & R8 COMMON ORDER Consistently there is no representation for the petitioner. When the Civil Revision Petitions were listed for hearing on 12.04.2019, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that he has given change of Vakalat and handed over the papers to the sole petitioner. However, no counsel had entered appearance for the petitioner. In these circumstances, the Registry was directed to print the name of the petitioner in the cause list. Thereafter, when the Civil Revision Petitions were listed for hearing on 25.04.2019 printing the name of the petitioner in the cause list, none appeared for her. Hence, the Registry was directed to list the matters today i.e. on 26.04.2019 under the caption 'for dismissal'.

2. Today also there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the Civil Revision Petitions for non prosecution. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Rj To The Principal District Munsif Court, Tiruppur.

Copy to The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court,Madras.

C.R.P.(NPD)No.279 & 280 of 2006 rji[co] srg 20/06/2019