Thajunnisa v. Arulmighu Thillaiamman Temple

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN S.A.NO.1171 OF 2008 AND M.P.NO.1 OF 2008 Thajunnisa .. Appellant/Respondent/ Defendant Vs.

Arulmighu Thillaiamman Temple, Chidambaram, by its Executive Officer having his office within Chidambaram.

.. Respondent/Appellant/ Plaintiff PRAYER:

Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree dated 18.07.2007 made in A.S.No.90 of 2006 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge of Chidambaram reversing the well considered judgment and decree dated 20.01.2006 and made in O.S.No.365 of 1998 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Chidambaram. For Appellant : Mr.N.Sankaravadivel For Respondent : Mr.K.Chandrasekaran

J U D G M E N T

(The case has been heard through video conferencing) The learned counsel for the appellant has given a letter to withdraw the second appeal. The learned counsel for the respondent has given no objection.

2. Recording the letter given by the learned counsel for the appellant, the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rpl https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram.

2.The Principal District Munsif, Chidambaram. Copy To The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras - 104.

+1cc to Mr.K.Chandrasekaran, Advocate, S.R.No.40958 S.A.No.1171 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008 BP(CO) CS/16/12/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/