B Viswanathan v. Sm Habeebullah

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 19.03.2019

CORAM:

The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISHKUMAR C.R.P(NPD).Nos. 503 and 509 of 2006 and C.M.P.No.3711 of 2006 1.B.Viswanathan 2.B.Arjunan ...Petitioners in both C.R.Ps(NPD) vs.

1.S.M.Habeebullah ... Sole Respondent in C.R.P(NPD).No.503 of 2006 2.Y.Yasodha Yuvaraj 3.S.M.Habeebullah

...Respondents 1 & 2 in

C.R.P(NPD).No.509 of 2006 COMMON PRAYER: These Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the judgments and decrees dated 21.11.2005 passed in R.C.A.Nos.15 and 16 of 2005 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge of Nilgiris at Uthagamandalam confirming the fair and final orders dated 21.03.2005 passed in R.C.O.P.Nos. 46 and 62 of 2002 on the file of the learned Rent Controller, Uthagamandalam. For Petitioner : Mr.S.K.Rakhunathan in both C.R.Ps(NPD) For Respondents : No appearance in both C.R.Ps(NPD) COMMON ORDER When the matter is taken up today, it is seen from the records that notice was due to the respondents since batta was not paid. It is also seen that these revision Petitions are of the year 2006, evenso, the revision petitioner did not take any steps to prosecute these Civil Revision Petitions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. In view of the same, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vkr/mbi To 1.The Subordinate Judge of Nilgiris, Uthagamandalam.

2.The Rent Controller, Uthagamandalam.

3.The Section Officer V.R.Section, High Court, Chennai -104.

C.R.P(NPD).Nos. 503 and 509 of 2006 VG II(CO) RRS(03/05/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/