Aneesh Fathima v. The State Rep.By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the First day of February Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.1835 of 2022 1 ANEESH FATHIMA [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 RAHEEM BEEVI 3 FATHIMA FARJANA Vs THE STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, NANNILAM, THIRUVARUR DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.1 OF 2022.

For Petitioner : M/S.C.PRABAKARAN Advocate For Respondent : MR. A.GOKULAKRISHNAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 498(A), 294 (b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC, in Crime No.1 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. It is the case of the prosecution that the defacto complainant has lodged a complaint with the respondent police during first week of December 2021 alleging that the petitioners are sisters-in-law and mother-in-law of the defacto complainant. The marriage between the defacto complainant and one Fakrudeen Ali took place four years ago. Out of the wedlock, they are blessed with one child. The said Fakrudeen Ali is working in abroad for the past four years. Subsequently, the petitioners herein have demanded dowry from the defacto complaint, abused her and driven out from the matrimonial house. Hence, this complaint.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and nothing to do with the alleged offence and they have been falsely implicated in the above case.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for State would submit that the investigation is still pending. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

5. On seeing the gravity of offence and the antecedents of the petitioners and that the investigation has not been completed, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 01/02/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, NANNILAM, THIRUVARUR DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.C.PRABAKARAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.1835/2022 Date :01/02/2022 RW 08/02/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/