M. Hemanthkumar v. The Vice President And Branch

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13.06.2019 CORAM :

The Hon'ble Mrs.VIJAYA K.TAHILRAMANI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P. No.35387 of 2002 M.Hemanthkumar .. Petitioner -vs1.Indus Ind Bank, rep. by The Vice President and Branch Head, No.3, Village Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034.

2.V.Subramanian 3.Reserve Bank of India, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-1.

4.The Commissioner of Police, Egmore, Chennai.

(RR 3 and 4 impleaded as per order dt.27.9.2002 in WPMP.54897/2002 and struck off vide order dated 03.02.2006) .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent relating to the registered notice dated 08.07.2002 issued to the petitioner under Chapter III Section 13 of the Securitisation and Reconstructions of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Ordinance 2002 and quash the same.

For Petitioner :

No appearance For Respondents :

Mr.P.Elayaraj Kumar for M/s.Ramalingam Asso. For R-1 :

R-2 vacated :

RR3 and 4 struck off, vide order dt. 03.02.2006.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

O R D E R

There is no representation for the petitioner.

2. When the matter was listed on 10.06.2019, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Gowtham S.Raman, submitted that in spite of writing a letter to the petitioner, he has not received any instructions and therefore, he reported no instructions. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Registry was directed to print the name of the petitioner in the cause list on the next date of hearing, i.e., on 11.06.2019. Accordingly, on 11.06.2019, the matter was listed with the name of the petitioner being printed in the cause list, however, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal' on 13.06.2019, i.e., today.

3. As stated earlier, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner.

In view of the above, we have no other alternative except to dismiss the writ petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. sra Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar +2cc to M/s.Ramalingam Associates, Advocate, SR.No.48208 W.P.No.35387 of 2002 Kak(17/07/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/