Madras High CourtCRP/1140/2014rejected

Brindamani v. Periyammal

2017-01-10Honourable Mrs Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10.01.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA CRP PD.No.1140 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 Brindamani .. Petitioner vs

1. Periyammal

2. Kumarasamy

3. Kandasamy

4. Rajinikanth

5. Santhoshkumar

...Respondents

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 30.01.2014 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2014 in R.C.O.P.No.31 of 2011 on the file of the Rent Controller cum II Additional District Munsif Court, Salem.

For Petitoner : Mr.R.Neelakandan

ORDER

The revision is directed against an order passed by the learned Rent Controller under 8 Rule 9 C.P.C, which is only appealable and the revision filed PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J., srn by the petitioner is not maintainable. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is rejected. The Registry is directed to return the original order copies filed by the petitioner to the learned counsel for the petitioner. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 10.01.2017 srn Index: Yes/No Internet:Yes To The Rent Controller cum II Additional District Munsif Court, Salem.

CRP PD.No.1140 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 http://www.judis.nic.in