← Library
Madras High CourtWP/14600/2011dismissed for nonprosecution

B.Dhavamani v. The Assistant Executive

2021-03-11Honourable Mr Justice C. Saravanan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.03.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P. No. 14600 of 2011 (Through Video Conferencing) B.Dhavamani, S/o.Balakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Assistant Executive Engineer, The Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Nellikuppam Town, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District.

2. The Assistant Engineer, The Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Nellikuppam Town, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District.

3. J.Purushotaman (Deceased)

4. J.Nagarajan, S/o.Janarthanam Reddiar

5. Geetha, W/o.(Late)J.Purushothaman

6. Pradeep Kumar, S/o.(Late)J.Purushothaman

7. Ashwin Kumar, S/o.(Late)J.Purushothaman ... Respondents (R5 to R7 Substituted as LRS of the Deceased R3 vide order dated 22/02/2021 made in WMP.No.18865 of 2020) Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 2nd respondent in Ka.Na.AE Nellikuppa/Ko.Court A.No.017/2011-12 dated 25.04.2011 and quash the same subsequently directing the 2nd respondent to provide electricity connection under section 27(2) (4) of the Electricity Code 2004 to the petitioner premises in Door No.510, in Survey No.78A, Nellikuppam Town, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

For Petitioner : No appearance For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Varun Kumar For R3 & R4 : Mr.C.Prasanna Venkatesh

ORDER

This case was listed under the caption 'for dismissal' on the previous occasion i.e., on 08.03.2021 as continuously there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On that day, when the case was called, Mr.K.Sembulingam, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared and submitted that he became Public Prosecutor in 2015 and gave Change of Vakalat to the petitioner to engage another counsel. He was therefore directed to file a memo to that effect.

2. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner and no memo has been filed to that effect. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing with the remedy in this writ petition. Under these circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Assistant Executive Engineer, The Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Nellikuppam Town, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District.

2. The Assistant Engineer, The Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Nellikuppam Town, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District.

+1cc to Mr.C.Prasanna Venkatesh, Advocate SR.NO..16001 AKM/01.04.21/2P- 4C/ W.P. No. 14600 of 2011 11.03.2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/