G.Sikkandar Ali v. The State By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.01.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN G.Sikkandar Ali ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The State by The Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore District.

2.The Inspector of Police, SEC Department, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore District.

3.Mr.Mohan, Sub Inspector of Police, SEC Department, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore District.

4.The Inspector of Police, Podanur Police Station, Coimbatore District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents not to harass the petitioner on the pretext of enquiry without issuing summons under Page No. 1 of 4

Section 41A of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Mohan For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner on the pretext of enquiry without issuing summons under Section 41A of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents submitted that there is no petition enquiry or FIR is pending against the petitioner with the fourth respondent police.

3.Recording the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Writ Petition is dismissed as not necessary. No costs.

27.01.2023 Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No sp Page No. 2 of 4

To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore District.

2.The Inspector of Police, SEC Department, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore District.

3.Mr.Mohan, Sub Inspector of Police, SEC Department, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore District.

4.The Inspector of Police, Podanur Police Station, Coimbatore District.

5.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

Page No. 3 of 4

G.CHANDRASEKHARAN, J.

sp 27.01.2023 Page No. 4 of 4