← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/1297/2023granted

Prathap Giri v. Inspector Of Police

2023-01-24Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi6 pages

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 392 & 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.240 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution as per the de-facto complainant is that on 29.12.2022 at about 7.00 a.m., the accused waylaid him and by threatening him at knife point, robbed a sum of Rs.200/- from him and also threatened the public. Hence, the case.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is no way connected with the alleged offence and he is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. He also stated that the similarly placed co-accused has been granted bail. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

1 / 6

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner along with the other accused, waylaid the de-facto complainant and had taken a sum of Rs.200/- from him at knife point. He further stated that the accused have also threatened the public gathered there. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that without prejudice to the rights, the petitioner is ready to deposit the amount of Rs.10,000/- to the credit of crime number. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also 2 / 6

taking note of the fact that the petitioner is volunteered to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- to the credit of the Crime Number, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

8. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Poonamallee, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stands dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) to the credit of Crime No.240 of 2022 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Poonamallee, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on such deposit, the de-facto complainant is 3 / 6

permitted to withdraw the same, on filing undertaking affidavit and proper identification and acknowledgment;

[b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on alternative days at 10.30 a.m. for a period of three months and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

4 / 6

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC. 24.01.2023 ham 5 / 6

T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.

ham 24.01.2023 6 / 6