Ar Ranganayagalu v. Palanisamy

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 21.04.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL AND M.P.NO.1 OF 2008 1.A.R.Ranganayagalu S/o. A.R.Ramasamy 2.A.R.Ramithalakshmi W/o. A.R.Ranganayagalu Both are residing at 15-A, Muniappan Koil Street, Shevapet, Salem - 2.

...

Appellants / Appellants / Defendants Vs.

1.Palanisamy (Died) S/o. Senthos Chettiar 2.Padmanabhan S/o. Palanisamy Both are residing at 12, Mariamman Koil Street, Gugal, Salem - 6.

(R1 - Died. Recorded vide Court Order dated March 27, 2026 made in S.A.No.141 of 2008) ...

Respondents / Respondents / Plaintiffs Page No.1 of 4

PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated November 22, 2006 made in A.S.No.131 of 2006, on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Salem, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated June 5, 2006 made in O.S.No.1285 of 2004, on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Salem.

For Appellants :

No appearance For Respondent-1 :

Died For Respondent-2 :

Ms.A.Nilaphar for Ms.R.Meenal

JUDGMENT

Daily Order dated April 10, 2026 of this Court, reads thus: 'Mr.D.Shivakumaran, Advocate and Mrs.Nilaphar, representing Ms.R.Meenal, Counsel on record for the second respondent are before this Court.

2.Mr.D.Shivakumaran, Advocate submits that he had already reported 'no instructions'.

3.This Court vide Order dated April 7, 2026, directed the Registry to print the names of the appellants in the cause list. However, only the first appellant's name has been shown in today's cause list.

4.Registry is directed to print the name of the appellants 1 and 2 in the cause list in the next listing date. 5.List the matter on 21.04.2026.'

Page No.2 of 4

2.Pursuant to the Order of this Court dated April 10, 2026, the names of the appellants have been shown in the cause list. The appellants are called absent and there is no representation for the appellants. Hence, this Court has no other option except to dismiss this Second Appeal for default. 3.Accordingly, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 21.04.2026 Index : Yes / No : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No TK To 1.The Principal Sub Court Salem.

2.The Principal District Munsif Salem.

Page No.3 of 4

R.SAKTHIVEL, J.

TK 21.04.2026 Page No.4 of 4